![]() | |||
| Crowds gather at Seton Castle to view new interpretive panels |
"Seton Castle...on the last rampart of the Rockies where the Buffalo Wind is blowing."
Monday, June 12, 2017
Interpretive Panels at Seton Castle
Tuesday, March 28, 2017
An Important Anniversary: The Founding of Standing Rock March 28, 1902
![]() | |||||
| Silver Bay, New York 1910 Seton with campers |
One hundred and fifteen years ago today Ernest Thompson
Seton nervously awaited the arrival forty-two boys to a clearing near his home
of “Wyndygoul” in the Cos Cob neighborhood of Greenwich, Connecticut. Some of
them had vandalized his property. He wanted to offer all of them a chance to
experience the outdoors in a new way.
Seton wrote, “I knew something of boys, in fact I am much of
a boy myself.”
He invited them to spend a weekend of camping, swimming, and
storytelling. Out this experience came Woodcraft and the international Scouting
movements.
The campground became known as Standing Rock. It included
the first Council Ring (subsequently a main feature of just about all summer
youth camps).
In August 1910, the lessons from Standing Rock inspired
another camping adventure, at Silver Bay (Lake George, New York), the first
official camp of the Boy Scouts of America, also organized by Seton.
A century + 15 years later the legacy of Standing Rock
continues its great work of promoting the glories of nature, the importance of
self-reliance, and the ethic of service to the larger community.
Tuesday, February 28, 2017
Seton film shows at Las Cruces International Film Festival
My film: "Ernest Thompson Seton and the Exploration of Canada's Fabled Aylmer Lake" will be shown at the Las Cruces International Film Festival on Saturday March 11 at 1:00pm. Subject: Seton's 1907 Arctic expedition. A chronicle of my 2015 expedition to the lake will be found elsewhere in this blog.
Details at Las Cruces International Film Festival web site.
Tuesday, January 31, 2017
anno ab incarnatione lupus 123 E.E., Annual Letter to Lobo
Dear Lobo,
I have been writing these to you yearly, expressing
appreciation for all your work in the world, even dating a new historical era
from the date of your death, now that BC, AD, CE, etc. seem irrelevant.
January 31 of the Environmental Era is a special
day with the growing hours of light (in New Mexico at least) becoming more
evident. While Earth Day (April 22) is a day to celebrate Nature, this date
should become one of reflection on what is happening to the world you knew only
so briefly.
Unfortunately, I don’t have much positive news to
report. This past year of 122 E.E. was not a particularly good one. First and
most importantly, it was the hottest on record in terms on averaged annual
global temperature. The temperature has risen 1.3° Celsius since the time when you roamed the plains of
the Corrumpa. (That translates to 2.3° Fahrenheit for
you as a non-scientist wolf.)
According
to the European Union’s Copernicus Climate Change Service, earth is now “on the
edge” of runaway heating. Imagine yourself in ferocious pursuit of an antelope
on an exceptionally hot, sunny day when,
at the end of the chase, there is no way to cool off. That should give you an
idea of what we are up against.
On the same day as the release of this report,
National Public Radio ran an interview with someone who, as I recall, has the
title of Secretary of Energy. He spoke calmly about someday, decades from now,
when carbon fuel use will gradually be replaced by renewables such as solar
power. Decades from now! He should have been panicking, promising to lead a
campaign to get us off of carbon right away. And, compared to the joker who has
replaced him, well, words fail. Makes me want to howl.
Almost no one mentions—outside of obscure corners
of the internet, something like the scent marking you use to interpret—that
cows, as leading methane producers, are just as important in causing climate
change as fossil fuels. Little did you know (or at least I think you didn’t
know) that by killing cows you were doing your part to combat climate change.
You were right to kill so many of them.
I could go on with list of terrible and destructive
political developments here and abroad by populists, fascists, and terrorists,
but I’m running out of energy (so to speak). To put it in terms you would
understand, imagine a world of wolf hunters run amuck (actually, last year 14
Mexican Gray Wolves were murdered in New Mexico and Arizona) and you will get
an idea of what 122 E.E. has been like.
Thanks again for your sacrifice in attempting to
warn us Lobo, and for your ongoing inspiration. I will hope that our collective
environmental consciousness will continue to grow stronger and that next year,
I may be able to give you a better report.
(Actually, I’m not counting on it, but according to
Joanna Macy and other environmentalists, we must hold on to positive thoughts
if we are to have any chance to making it to 124 E.E. and beyond.)
Your devoted admirer,
The Author
Friday, December 9, 2016
Was Seton a Conservative or Liberal?
![]() | |||
| The White Wind Blows (from winter into spring) |
Ernest Thompson Seton didn’t leave a published record of his
political beliefs, although there are clues. He greatly admired Theodore
Roosevelt (more than Roosevelt admired him as it turned out) but Seton was not
a U.S. citizen during the period of TR’s political activity; their relationship
seems to have defined by their common interest in natural history. By the time of
the Franklin Delano Roosevelt presidency, Seton had become an American citizen
and a supporter of FDR.
Seton made clear his admiration for the historical
communitarianism of American Indians and First Nations peoples. I suspect that
he would have liked at least some of what Bernie Sanders stands for as a
“democratic socialist.” Ralph Nadar has defined those who use this term in the
American context as “New Dealers,” that is, supporters of government programs meant to benefit
a broad segment of the population, as opposed to a select few. That would seem
to position Seton on the political left, at least as it was defined in the
1930s and 1940s. He would have been appalled at the current rise of populism.
“Politics” as an activity is usually taken to mean
partisanship in favor or in opposition to certain issues in economics, domestic
social issues, war and peace, etc. In a more general way, an attitude or belief
can be political, such as Seton’s belief in Darwinism or his championing of
Native Americans or his stance regarding the existence of an emotional life
among non-human animals. But ascribing these attitudes to the political “left”
or “right” doesn’t fit with our current notion of politics.
In this series of essays I have addressed the many aspects
of Seton as naturalist, explorer, artist, writer and so on. These parts of his
life do not exist outside of the political (in the general sense mentioned
above) so the question of his conservatism or liberalism is worth asking in an
investigation of his life and views. He was not doctrinaire; he took the best
of both positions.
Seton called for justice for native peoples (liberalism) while
also promoting what he understood as their traditional values (conservatism). He
rejected the conservative position of accepting our birth-assigned status place
(he certainly didn’t) but rejected a notion sometimes followed by liberals of
putting present needs above future concerns. Lifecraft philosophy, while
strongly supportive of creativity, also looks to the restraint of authority to
hold down the chaos. In this regard, Seton seems to weigh in on order and interest
above liberty and choice.
Through Lifecraft, Seton attempted to strike the right
balance: the honoring of individual expression and achievement within a community to which one owes
service as the price of liberty.
This service to community, moreover, comes out of individual
choice, not through convention or force. By contrast, taking a traditional
conservative line, Robert Baden-Powell held that service is owed to the
prevailing societal arrangements—especially one’s country—because order flows
from nationalist respect. The difference between these two approaches is
monumental.
Seton took his most extraordinary step when he claimed that
animals are different from us only by degree, that they, like us, have
emotions, thoughts, feelings and desires. While his stories made him famous
(and wealthy), the conservative backlash to this position destroyed much of the
literary reputation he had worked so hard to achieve. Theodore Roosevelt, among
others, could find no meaning in what Seton was attempting to convey. If Seton
was correct, then everything believed by most people at that time had to be
mistaken. This was Seton’s most revolutionary position—and it cost him dearly.
His most prescient position was one that cannot be characterized
as either liberal or conservative. Seton
began drawing and writing about what I would call our war on nature as early as
1901. By 1925, he felt that damage to the environmental was already spiraling
out of control. He did not promote specific policies but through his own life modeled
the power that a rising consciousness about our place in the world might hold.
The Seton Legacy offers us an acceptance of the rational (in
the case of climate change, conclusions derived from the scientific method)
combined with an acknowledgement of history (we can compare conditions from
past times to our own) and an obligation to the future (what we do now matters
in a deeply moral way).
See my Seton Legacy Project blog on
achieving peace through justice posted October 22, 2012, “St. Paul the
Apostle.” For a comparison of liberalism vs. conservatism, inspired by a
reading of the scholar Yuval Levin, see “Why the Environmentalist Movement Has
Not Saved Us (Yet)” December 2016. at www.davidlwitt.com.
Thursday, September 1, 2016
Seton, Humboldt and the Recognition of Nature
![]() | ||
| Willows replace meadows in the warming Arctic, Sand Hill Bay Camp, Aylmer Lake, NWT Canada |
In the first two volumes of Lives
of Game Animals, Seton repeatedly returns to the theme of wildlife
conservation, calling for preservation while at the same time doubting that his
efforts can be successful. In the third volume, his strikingly gloomy essay
“The Lament” predicts not only a bad end for our wild kindred, but for our
civilization as well: “The end is in sight. Desolation sweeps from sea to sea.”
Seton clearly referred to the end
of wild nature—which Bill McKibbin exactly named in 1989—but compared also to
John Muir, whose environmentalist critique was more direct, Seton’s remains
oblique. I searched for “nature” in the indexes to Seton’s autobiography, in
Julia Seton’s By A Thousand Fires, in
the biographies written by Keller and Anderson, and then even in my own book.
The word does not appear, not withstanding that whether Seton was writing about
wildlife, aboriginal American cultures, or outdoor education for youth, the
common element in each is—nature.
Is nature so close that we don’t
see it? And if that is the case, what is “nature?” This is an important
question, for how do we protect and preserve something unless we can first name
it? We can name the danger, most dramatically the spate of alarming reports in
July and August 2016 suggesting that the theoretical “tipping point” for the
climate may have reached, as global high temperature records seem on the brink
of spiraling out of control. (For Example see the NASA report, August 31, 2016.
“Nature” is endangered. But what
does that mean?
*
In The Invention of Nature, Alexander Von Humboldt’s New World—Andrea
Wulf’s biography of the German adventurer, philosopher, and scientist—we find a
way into this subject. In his great 1807 masterwork, Essay on the Geography of Plants, Humboldt defined nature as being “a
reflection of the whole.” (Wulf, pg. 128.) He further wrote, “In this great
chain of causes and effects, no single fact can be considered in isolation.” (Wulf,
pg. 5.) Henry David Thoreau and John Muir said much the same—a direct
reflection of Humboldt’s influence upon them both.
A reflection of the whole, a
connection of causes and effects includes all that we may define as
wild-nature, natural habitats along with their inhabitants, nature is all that
outside stuff, but also us with our destructive ways. According to Wulf, the
first person to make that connection was Humboldt. His study of nature, a
combination of Enlightenment empiricism (named “science” in the 19th
century) and the emotional (e.g. poetry, painting, creativity) became a new
means of interpreting the world—known as natural history. Wulf shows that
everyone from Darwin (to Seton whom of course she does not name) to today’s
environmentalists are beneficiaries of Humboldt’s brilliant insights, for all
that activists have remained unaware of their historical linage.
During Humboldt’s exploration of
the Americas (1799-1804), he observed, “What speaks to the soul escapes our
measurements.” (Wulf pg. 72.) But that soul recognition did not escape the
lyrical landscape appreciations of Muir or the wildlife observations of Seton.
If you don’t already know the emotions brought up by natural history, try
reading the last three paragraphs of “Lobo, The King of Currumpaw” to a live
audience without getting choked up. (Apparently, Seton himself had a difficult
time getting to the end when he related the Lobo story.) Thoreau observed, “the
most interesting and beautiful facts are so much the more poetry.” (Wulf, pg.
259) It is almost as if Thoreau was anticipating Seton’s work.
*
Seton was familiar with Thoreau’s
work, but did not leave a direct account of the authors who had the most direct
impact on his philosophy of nature. One clue I have is the late inventory of
books from his Seton Castle library. That list, although long, represents only
a fraction of the original collection. It does include Humboldt’s famous work Cosmos, A Sketch of the Physical Description
of the Universe (1845-1862) whose readers included, (besides Seton)
according to Wulf: Darwin, Thoreau, Muir, Ralph Waldo Emerson, early
environmentalist George Perkins Marsh, and artist/scientist Ernst Haeckel. Although
I did not find another Humboldt book in the collection, Seton used his Personal Narrative of Travels to the
Equinoctial Regions of America (1852 edition) as a source for his chapter
on the Jaguar in Lives of Game Animals.
I cannot (for the moment) establish whether or not Seton read Emerson, Marsh,
and Haeckel, but he certainly would have known of them.
*
Wulf selected only a handful of
artists, scientists, writers, and naturalists—out of countless thousands—who were
influenced by Humboldt. Seton as naturalist, as explorer/wilderness adventurer,
as observer and admirer of native cultures, as educator, writer and artist, as
reconciler of head and heart (science and emotion), as both pragmatist and lyrical
interpreter of nature, is surely beneficiary (along with many of us today) of
the intellectual path forced by Humboldt over two centuries ago.
I was struck by another important
similarity between Seton and Humboldt. I have written (as has Seton biographer
Brian Morris) that Seton has become largely invisible to our contemporary life
due to the pervasiveness of his ideas about conservation, ecology, education,
environmentalism, and perhaps most importantly, animal sentience. Wulf points
out that Humboldt became famous in his own time for his worldview: “His vision
of nature has passed into our consciousness as if by osmosis. It is almost as
though his ideas have become so manifest that the man behind them has
disappeared.” (Wulf pg. 335) She also writes, “Humboldt’s interdisciplinary
approach to science and nature is more relevant than ever…His concept of nature
as one of global patterns is more relevant than ever.”
Humboldt and the line of thinkers descended from
him have attempted to prove that we are not separate from nature. The lesson we
can take from them is that what goes on in the environment around us, from
evolution to pollution, from habitat preservation to species extinction is “a
reflection of the whole.” The question for wild-nature and
humanity-civilization is: will we recognize that wholeness—the very definition
of nature—while there is still time to save some of the goodness in the world
that remains, both the natural and the human-made?
Thursday, July 28, 2016
NEW SETON EXHIBITION
The Arctic Prairies
On Sunday, August 14th, the Academy for the Love
of Learning will mark the 156th birthday of Ernest Thompson Seton
with a new art exhibition and a documentary film.
In a highlight of his extraordinary life as an artist,
writer, and scientist, Seton led a daring expedition into the Arctic wilderness
of the Northwest Territories in Canada, an area then largely unknown to the
outside world. His dual goals: documenting the wildlife of the Boreal forest
and the tundra, and determining the geography of a remote lake, Aylmer.
Last year, the Academy mounted the “Arctic Prairies II” expedition
to Aylmer Lake in search of the places Seton described more than a century
earlier. The results of our research can be seen in an exhibition of his
drawings, and in a new 30-minute documentary film, Ernest Thompson Seton and the Exploration of Canada’s Fabled Aylmer Lake.
Located at 133 Seton Village Road, twenty minutes from
downtown Santa Fe, the Academy’s Seton Gallery will be open on August 14 from
12:00 to 4:00pm. The film will take place in the Leonard Bernstein Room
starting at 3:00pm. Admission is free, but seating for the film is
limited. A second showing of the film will take place on Tuesday August 16th
at 7:00pm. The film will be introduced by Arctic Prairies II expedition
members.
Schedule for Sunday Afternoon, August 14:
High
Noon! Seton Gallery Opens
12:30 Guided Tour of Building, grounds
and Seton History
1:30 Welcome to the Academy! by
Aaron Stern, Founder & President, Academy for the Love of Learning
1:35 “3 Questions That Came Out Of
Nowhere” A presentation by Patty Nagle, Arctic Prairies II expedition member
2:30 Remarks by Aaron Stern
2:45 Annual Toast to the Chief by David L. Witt, Curator
3:00
Premier of Film “Ernest Thompson Seton and the Exploration of Canada’s
Fabled Aylmer Lake”
4:00 Guided Tour of Building, grounds and Seton History
(Background on the 1907 and 2015
expeditions by David L. Witt)
Through his writing and the example
of his life Ernest Thompson Seton called on us to respect nature and all its
creatures, and to develop a personal and meaningful relationship with the outdoors.
In his work he demonstrated our close kinship with wild animals but as well he
examined the dark consequences of environmental destruction.
Seton led an expedition to the
western sub-Arctic in 1907 that gave him an opportunity to reflect on the nature
and society of a place that is far away from the big cities of Canada and the
U.S, but not so far as not to matter.
Given that the rapid environmental
changes overtaking the Arctic will have consequences for everyone as the planet
continues to warm, last year the Academy sent its own expedition to explore the
northernmost part of Seton’s route, Aylmer Lake.
In Seton’s time, the area was home
to abundant wildlife including caribou, musk ox, and wolves. One hundred and
eight years later the once vast migrations of caribou have become the stuff of
history and may not long into the future become the stuff of legends. Global
heating and over hunting (by humans) have made Aylmer a more quiet and somber
place, although the landscape of endless sky and low but rugged hills are much
as Seton experienced.
Human activity has increased in the
Northwest Territories and the sub-Arctic has experienced summer warming from
climate change. Highways now provide access to the southern third of Seton’s
route, but Aylmer
Lake remains accessible only by boat or by air—a nearly two-hour airplane trip
from Yellowknife.
Importantly, with modern explorers
going in search of the Seton legacy, the story continues. In 2015, the
experience of wind and storm, twenty-four hour daylight, and an enforced
closeness to the land (expedition members had to fish for their food) led
everyone on the trip into periods of reflection and just being.
Expedition members from the Academy
(three of the five on the trip from last summer) will share their experiences
with the audience as an introduction to the film.
(Background on Seton by David L.
Witt)
In May 1907 New York-based
artist/naturalist/writer Ernest Thompson Seton (1860-1946) began the most
extraordinary wilderness journey of his life. By the age of 47 he had become
the most important wildlife illustrator of his generation and, as the creator
of the realistic wild animal story, achieved best-seller status as an author.
He popularized the cause of wildlife conservation to a mass audience, laying
the groundwork (along with Muir and Roosevelt) for today’s environmentalism.
He introduced a concept of outdoors
education that became the worldwide Scouting movement (including the Boy Scouts
of America.) He was an established expert on Mammalogy and Ornithology and made
important contributions to the sciences of Ecology and Ethology. Later authors
from Ernest Hemingway to Aldo Leopold to David Attenborough cited him as a
major influence.
English by birth and Canadian by
upbringing, Seton spent much of his early adulthood exploring wilderness
Manitoba, sometimes in the company of First Nations peoples from whom he
learned hunting, survival skills, and traditional native concepts of land use.
By the time of his middle age he had logged more wilderness time than just
about any of his peers, but had not explored the Arctic.
He knew about 19th
Canadian explorer George Back and his 1820s expedition north of Great Slave
Lake to little known Aylmer Lake, and a later expedition by Warburton Pike. Seton
had recommended the spiritual and adventure value of engaging in a six-month
wilderness immersion. Taking his own advice, Seton took half a year to explore
regions south and north of Great Slave Lake in Canada’s Northwest Territories.
Accompanied by American biologist
Edward Preble and by native guides (who themselves had never been so far
north), Seton left his family, career and New York society for an arduous
adventure between May and October exploring little documented lakes and rivers.
His goal was to chronicle the plants and wildlife of the region. Both Seton and
Preble kept journals; Seton used them for his book, The Arctic Prairies, published in 1911.
The expedition combined geography
with field biology to become the Northwest Territories equivalent of Thomas
Jefferson’s Notes on the State of
Virginia. They canoed north on the Mackenzie River arriving at Aylmer Lake
three months later. Preble continued walking farther into the Barren Lands
reaching approximately 64° 40’ north latitude, two degrees south of the Arctic Circle. Afterwards,
they returned south, leaving late enough in the year to experience the first
winter frosts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





