The December 9, 2013 Time
cover story – “America’s Pest Problem” – called for the mass extermination of
wildlife. Apparently, wild animals are inconveniently in our way. This
appallingly unconscious attitude suggests that, as pervasive as Seton’s
influence is, that influence has not penetrated everywhere.
By contrast, Aaron Stern, founder of the Academy for the
Love of Learning, sent me a link to a
documentary about a South African woman who has achieved a remarkable level of
empathy for our wild brethren. The film shows her using a special talent to
actually communicate with animals. (http://www.cultureunplugged.com/documentary/watch-online/play/11936/The-Animal-Communicator)
From the film promo:
“Synopsis: What if
you could talk to animals and have them talk back to you?
Anna Breytenbach has dedicated her life to what she calls interspecies communication. She sends detailed messages to animals through pictures and thoughts. She then receives messages of remarkable clarity back from the animals.”
Anna Breytenbach has dedicated her life to what she calls interspecies communication. She sends detailed messages to animals through pictures and thoughts. She then receives messages of remarkable clarity back from the animals.”
Compare
this to “The Wolf and the Primal Law” in Seton’s Great Historic Animals (1937). In this story, about the accidental
betrayal of a wolf by a wolf lover, Seton resurrects his alter ego “Yan.” In
earlier stories, he used Yan when writing about his own adventures and
abilities. It seems that Yan, like Anna Breytenbach in 2012, can directly
communicate with wild animals.
“He was intensely sensitive, and had the most amazing sympathy
with animals – not only sympathy, but knowledge of, and an understanding that
amounted to telepathy. I have seen him walk gently up to a wild deer feeding
out in the open, a deer that would have fled at speed from any one else.”
Indignant
at the brutality of a zoo keeper attempting to transfer a leopard from one cage
to another, Yan literally steps in, assuring the keeper that “there is no
danger.”
“He talked softly to the leopard for a minute…. Yan went in,
softly crooning a little purring sound in which were often heard the words:
‘Now Pussy; now, Pussy! Fear not, we are friends; we are friends.
There is no reason to suppose that the leopard understood the
words; but he got the friendly emanations. His hair no longer bristled; his
growling ceased; his eyes were not now flowing; his long whit whiskers like
antennae took in the kind vibrations. The look of anger died away; and gently
talking, Yan reached out his wand and scratched the leopard on the head.
Gradually, the spotted savage head went down, the creature leaned toward the
boy, and a low, deep, catlike purring was heard. It grew louder; and Yan
continued making medicine with his song, and nearer came, till his hand could
touch and stroke the leopard’s head.” (pg. 121-122)
We
can only hope that someday the lessons of Seton, Breytenbach, and others like
them will overcome the reactionary thinking of those for whom the others beings
with which we share this earth are perceived only as inconveniences.
Thanks for sharing, David! Reminds me of Roald Dahl's great short story, "The Boy Who Talked with Animals." Wouldn't be surprised if Dahl knew of Seton--you have any evidence of that? Also would like to know more about the details of the Time article--I had to check the date twice to make sure it appeared in 2013, not 1913! -Seth Biderman
ReplyDelete